Civil Liberties and the TSA: Less Body Scanners This Holiday Season is a Win For Liberty

by Zack Fulkerson, PolicyMic.com  |  published on November 25, 2012


As of November 15, the Transportation Security Agency has announced that it officially packed up over $14 million worth of its full-body scanner scanning machines, citing privacy concerns as the primary reason for suspending their use. Having just recently argued against the use of these machines as a detriment to privacy, this strikes me as a noteworthy landmark in the cause for personal liberty.

According to USA Today, these body-scanners produce “near naked images” of passengers, causing major delays in the free flow of travelers as each image must be viewed in a separate room, with clearance being radioed back to the checkpoint where the passenger is scanned. The machines were originally to be replaced with newer models that produce a generic “stick-figure-like” image. However, it was ruled that this newer technology was flawed and could not adequately measure security while alleviating privacy concerns.

The intrusive backscatter imaging devices were pulled about a month ago in New York City’s LaGuardia and JFK airports, Chicago O’Hare, and in Boston, Charlotte, Los Angeles, and Orlando. Having first planned to move these machines to smaller airports, TSA’s assistant administrator for security capabilities, John Sanders, says the machines have been moved to warehouse in Texas alongside over $100 million worth of other unused equipment (which should induce a tangential eye roll at this stockpile of government waste).

Although the move has yet to be made in all airports nationwide, it is certainly worth repeating that this is a victory for the liberty movement. Of course, it leaves some with legitimate concerns as to how we can address security concerns without doing damage to privacy. One might be left asking how we can sufficiently, simultaneously address safety and privacy in a free society.

As I had briefly touched on in my previous article on the subject, the fact that airlines are searching their passengers in order to keep travel “safe” (or else create the illusion of safety) is not the major issue. Although these acts are invasive and often questionable, there is no doubt that some airlines would likely be run this way with or without the TSA or government mandate.

No, the primary problem is the fact that the TSA are the employees of the federal government — meaning anyone whom wishes to travel by air must grovel with the state in order to do so. Like practically all government failure, implementing a one-size-fits-all plan for airport security is inefficient, ineffective, and reduces freedom. Because not only do the TSA’s searches delay air travel, but they have yet to produce any results, and have permanently changed the standard by which the government may step into our personal space and fondle our nether regions.

No comments yet - you can be the first!

Comments are closed.

Do you Love your country but hate your government?

Join your fellow Libertarians who seek a world of liberty; a world in which all individuals are sovereign over their own lives and no one is forced to sacrifice his or her values for the benefit of others. Join over 500,000 Americans who get their daily dose of minimal government and maximum freedom with The New Liberty Movement.

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.