civil rights

Guarding National Security Over Civil Rights

by GLENN SULMASY,  |  published on February 4, 2013

The delicate balance between promoting national security and civil rights is always difficult — in any society. With the advent of the 24-hour news media, and the growth of the Internet, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and other social networking sites, achieving a balance is even more critical. The war on al-Qaida has created additional problems for governments, particularly the U.S.

Holding trials for the prisoners at the detention center within the U.S. Naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, has been the test case for this balance over the past decade. Now with the Obama administration’s military commissions in the pre-trial motions phase of the trial of Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the accused mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and his four co-defendants, the rule of law, access to information and promoting the security of U.S. citizens are all on a collision course.

This past week, defense attorneys for the five accused 9/11 terrorists pressed for the public release of all information related to the CIA’s interrogation program and to release specific details about the so-called “black sites” in open court. Such outrageous requests by the defense team of Khalid Sheik Mohammed, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali and three others is reckless. The potential damage to national security as a result of such disclosures is tremendous, and puts more American lives at risk.

The defense team, aware of such damage, still pushed for the documents to be presented as unclassified in open court. Clearly, this is where national security, if it ever must, trumps civil liberties when balancing the two.

The discussion of whether enhanced interrogation techniques is, or was, appropriate is legitimate. The nation needs to truly examine what took place, how it took place and how best to ensure the U.S. does not, and perhaps is not perceived as, crossing the line of enhanced interrogation into torture.

The debate is real and critical to the next decade of this generational conflict. But this study, or “discovery,” should not be done as a lawyer’s fishing expedition or publicity stunt. It needs to be done in a professional, mature, and secure fashion. The ramifications of disclosing certain alleged actions by U.S. CIA or military members could prove tremendously damaging to U.S. stature and to the individuals allegedly involved.

No comments yet - you can be the first!

Comments are closed.

Do you Love your country but hate your government?

Join your fellow Libertarians who seek a world of liberty; a world in which all individuals are sovereign over their own lives and no one is forced to sacrifice his or her values for the benefit of others. Join over 500,000 Americans who get their daily dose of minimal government and maximum freedom with The New Liberty Movement.

We know how important your privacy is and your information is SAFE with us. We’ll never sell
your email address and you can unsubscribe at any time directly from your inbox.
View our full privacy policy.